Universidad de Guayaquil
Catálogo Bibliográfico

Should content be taught in english?: (Registro nro. 136786)

Detalles MARC
000 -Cabecera (24)
Campo de control interno 02453nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 - Número de control
Campo de control UCASAGRANDE21288
007 - Tipo material - Descripcion fisica - info general
Tipo material ta
008 - Códigos de longitud fija (40p)
Campo de control de longitud fija 210819s2018||||xx |||||||||||||| ||spa||
040 ## - Origen de la Catalogacion
Origen de la Catalogacion UCASAGRANDE
041 ## - Código de idioma (R)
Código de lengua del texto/banda sonora o título independiente (R) spa
082 ## - Número de la Clasificación
Código de Clasificación POS 2018
100 ## - Autor Personal
Autor Personal Calderón Rodríguez, Dennis
Término indicativo de función (R) autor
245 #0 - Titulo
Titulo Should content be taught in english?:
Subtitulo trabajo final para la obtención del Título de Magíster en Educación Superior: Investigación e Innovaciones Pedagógicas
250 ## - Mencion de edicion
Mencion de edicion 1a. ed.
260 ## - Editorial
Ciudad
Nombre de la Editorial Universidad Casa Grande. Departamento de Posgrado,
Fecha 2018
300 ## - Descripcion
Páginas 40 p.;
Dimensiones Digital
513 ## - Nota de periodo de años
Nota de periodo de años 2018
520 ## - Resumen
Resumen This article reports the results of an eight-week action research study of a university classroom innovation using direct instruction in English and peer assessment of an authentic professional task to help students learn 3Ddesign technical English. It is a quasi-experimental study with analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. The main objective was to investigate the impact of teaching a subject in English normally taught in Spanish. The purpose was to add additional guided learning hours and professional vocabulary in English to help students reach new national graduation requirements for English. The methodology included a pre-and post-test quantitative analysis of learning to use software for 3Ddesign, a comparison of final grades for a design project for the innovation group and a control group, and qualitative analysis of interviews of student perspectives to support findings and results. The control group was to assure that content learning was not affected. Results indicate that content learning was not affected, and professional English vocabulary improved. The results show a pre-test average of 4.12 and after the innovation we have a post-test average of 7.5, showing an improvement of 82% during the eight-week classroom innovation. Peer assessment probably had a stronger influence than direct instruction in English because the assessment of students' work by other students of equal status allowed them to improve design analysis through reflection and interaction and it helped them to understand content in English.
650 ## - Temas - Descriptores
Temas - Descriptores Enseñanza - Inglés
9 (RLIN) 58251
650 ## - Temas - Descriptores
Temas - Descriptores Evaluación
9 (RLIN) 72958
650 ## - Temas - Descriptores
Temas - Descriptores Tesis de Maestría
9 (RLIN) 78771
856 ## - URL - Ubicacion
URI/URL <a href="http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/bitstream/ucasagrande/1365/1/Tesis1562CALs.pdf">http://dspace.casagrande.edu.ec:8080/bitstream/ucasagrande/1365/1/Tesis1562CALs.pdf</a>
942 ## - Datos personalizados Koha
Tipo de Documento Tesis
Fecha procesamiento 2018-04-23
Catalogador Isledy
Existencias
Estado Colección Ubicacion permanente Ubicacion actual Fecha de Ingreso a la Biblioteca Prestamos Clasificación Código de barras Ultima fecha de verificacion Tipo de Item
  Tesis CD Biblioteca Tesis Biblioteca Tesis 04/23/2018   UCG 1562 CALs POS 2018 Tesis1562 08/20/2021 Tesis
Nos visitan